[saag] Re: [Ext] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02
"D. J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > When a draft claims to describe "the history of how cryptographic > > components have been documented and referenced in the IETF, particularly > > in RFCs", shouldn't the draft already have this list? > The previous document did so and most people thought it was a distraction. Citations needed. Which previous document supposedly had this list? What goal was this list supposedly a distraction from? Was this the same as the "history" goal in the current draft? What's the URL for the discussion supposedly establishing that "most people" thought the list was a distraction? Please get into the habit of providing URLs to back up your claims, rather than putting extra load on readers. ---D. J. Bernstein _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]