[saag] Re: [Ext] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02

You cannot draw a trend from one recent, fractious, discussion.

I am not sure what you are referring to.

I was responding to Paul Hoffman’s mail and I was referring to the recent SSHM discussion about NTRU.

I was referring to an apparent convergence for non-pq cryptography (inside and outside IETF) to support P256-AES-GCM and 25519-POLY-CHACHA.

I wasn’t responding to your mail.

If the draft “re” states that we don’t want a zillion non-NIST algorithms, as opposed to what, a handful of NIST ones?, that’s wrong because we never made explicit consensus to favor NIST. We were waiting for NIST, which is different.

That is not what i said in my email nor what the draft states.

Again, I was responding to Paul’s comment about the draft.

I am not sure how this discussion fits with the draft discussion though. What text do you think needs changing and what do you suggest as change ?

I have been trying to raise specific points with separate subject lines now.  And, for a third time, I was responding to Paul H’s email.  Is that not germane?

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]