[saag] Re: [Ext] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02

On Feb 16, 2025, at 07:56, D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:



When a draft claims to describe "the history of how cryptographic

components have been documented and referenced in the IETF, particularly

in RFCs", shouldn't the draft already have this list?

The previous document did so and most people thought it was a distraction.

Citations needed.

read the saag archives and meeting minutes. I also had personal conversations at the last two IETF meetings.

Which previous document supposedly had this list?

Current practices for new cryptography at the IETF

datatracker.ietf.org

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pwouters-crypto-current-practices-00#abstract

What
goal was this list supposedly a distraction from? Was this the same as
the "history" goal in the current draft? What's the URL for the
discussion supposedly establishing that "most people" thought the list
was a distraction?

read the archive and meeting minutes.

Please get into the habit of providing URLs to back up your claims,
rather than putting extra load on readers.

Please stop the habit of your unlimited email denial of service demanding other people act as your secretary or legal clerk.

Paul

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]