[saag] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02 ("one of th e reasons")

Thanks for your reply, it clarifies things.

> The text helps me and future ADs to answer these questions in the same way for everyone, and helps to point out that AD sponsoring
cryptographic algorithms is not the "current way" even if it has been done in the past.

I don’t see any text that says or implies and the only mentions in 2.2 says “may not be willing.”

Here is a suggestion.  The IESG could have a page where individual AD’s report their interest in sponsoring drafts.

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]