[saag] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02 ("one of th e reasons")
joel jaeggli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/19/25 13:13, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Here is a suggestion. The IESG could have a page where individual > AD’s report their interest in sponsoring drafts. > > * You mean generically or for specific drafts? I am confused what > you want to signal. > > Topics. “I am generally unwilling to AD-sponsor drafts of new > cryptographic algorithms, and would suggest you look to CFRG or > working groups that could use the new algorithm.” “I am very > interested in sponsoring drafts that proposes better ways to merge > IPv6 and IPv4 into something like IPv0xA” and so on. > When I was OPS AD the things that go sponsored were more or less exclusively things that didn't obviously have a home. If a working group is chartered in a particular area, or a class of work is broadly associated with an area meeting then it's not something that an AD should entertain IMHO. There will always be corner cases but professing and interest in sponsoring the corner cases lies down the path to madness. joel > > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email [email protected] _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]