[saag] Re: A short-lived WG for HPKE

"Salz, Rich" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID <IA1PR17MB6421BD9ABF662045A7EC3987CDA42@IA1PR17MB6421.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Moving to standards track implies shifting of ownership for registries.  We could say that, but I personally prefer to keep the charter lean.

I created do have an open issue to track that question though.

Moving ownership should be trivial, just a matter of words – don’t change the policy or current experts. Put that in the charter, even.  I think it’s wrong for the IRTF to “own” an IETF registry, and really all we’re doing is changing the ownership. It also fills a gap, since the IESG assigns DE’s; if we have a gap, the IRTF would have to create a policy, right?

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.