[saag] NASR BOF Follow-Up
"Liuchunchi\(Peter\)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi NASR, SAAG, Thanks everyone for participating and contributing valuable feedbacks to the NASR BOF last week! Thank you Nancy and Luigi for mediating a productive discussion, and thanks Deb for supervising the process. During the process, we had extensive discussions that showed both major interests in the problem and differing understanding of the objective. For example, NASR represents new use case requirements that aim to extend Remote Attestation benefits to the network scale, providing more comprehensive security visibility and behavioral assurance across network deployments to the customers. But NASR is not intended, in any capacity, to serve as a substitute for end-to-end encryption technology, etc. The poll result shows a clear consensus that this is an IETF problem, but a rougher (at best) or no consensus that the problem is well understood. To help on that, next steps we will work on a dedicated document that collects all valuable feedbacks from the BOF and resolve them one-by-one. Again, we sincerely thank everyone who contributed valuable feedbacks and cares about bringing more security and transparency to networks! Best regards, Peter (Chunchi) Liu _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]