[saag] Re: [nasr] Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABcZeBPGt-OLy9KGpTM22neE7F9ysD=Wm0zK6yHZoQ3gFHXqGw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 12:41 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > > However, it's not clear to me that that's true in this case, because > > unlike media players, network devices are highly configurable and a > > large number of the configuration directives might impact the > relevant > > security claims. Thus, determining whether an element is policy > > conformant is a matter of knowing not just what code it is running > > but the state of every relevant configuration directive. One could > > imagine this working at least three ways: > > I think you are making routers sound way more complicated than they are. > > 1. 90% of directives have little to no affect. > (I have one toe in the routing/operations space. I'm ASN26227) > Perhaps, but they still need to be individually examined in order to to determine that. Has someone done that? > 2. they are significantly less complicated than Windows, yet all that media > based DRM stuff you mentioned is dependant upon windows boot doing the > right thing. > But essentially none of the relevant stuff that needs to be attested to is configurable (by design). You just attest to the CDM contents. > In the former case, it is quite likely that there will be a large > > number of valid states, because each directive may have multiple > > acceptable values, and so you end up with combinatoric explosion > > issues if you just have a list of hashes [0]. In the latter case we > > yet, the *routing* people with the expertise here, and a few operators seem > pretty sure they can do this. > It's not uncommon to see people be overconfident about things prior to attempting them, especially in the area of security. Has someone actually gone through the exercise of examining every directive and determining which ones are relevant? -Ekr > > Either approach requires studying the impact of every existing > > configuration directive for each device type to know what the > > impact will be on the relevant policy claims. This seems challenging > > at best. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]