[saag] Re: [nasr] Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:50 AM Henk Birkholz <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 11.04.25 19:23, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> Hi Ekr,
>
> sorry for dragging you through this convo, but I think I now have a
> better understanding of your problem statement than before. Thanks!
>
> As far as I am understanding it for now, the question is: "is it
> possible to determine that the configuration/policy of a device is
> acceptable in a fashion that does not expose that configuration/policy
> to a counterparty?" That question would be independent from "RATS
> Evidence" which was popping up in the thread before.
>

To be clear, that was *Richard's* question. My question was prior to that,
namely "Is it practical to mechanically verify that a configuration is
acceptable?"

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]