[saag] Re: [nasr] Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up

Henk Birkholz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi ekr,

I apologize for mixing provenances... again! For me, dipping in into 
this thread occasionally, it is not easy to track data origin vs. data 
source without a napkin note.

Both questions:

"is it possible to determine that the configuration/policy of a device 
is acceptable in a fashion that does not expose that 
configuration/policy to a counterparty?"

and

"Is it practical to mechanically verify that a configuration is acceptable?"

sound like really good questions to me. Personally, I am under the 
assumption that both of these questions are not RATS questions and maybe 
not even SEC area questions. They seem to me more like OPS area 
questions, right?. Please chime in here on the SAAG list, if you think 
that was a weird thing to say! (Obviously, opsec is a thing, but I am 
referring the "mechanics" of the solution providing an answer to the 
questions).

I also think that (from a RATS perspective) the answer to those 
questions is really interesting (as it could inform the exposure of RATS 
conceptual messages). Will these questions be worked on?


Viele Grüße,

Henk


On 11.04.25 23:29, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:50 AM Henk Birkholz 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>     On 11.04.25 19:23, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> 
>     Hi Ekr,
> 
>     sorry for dragging you through this convo, but I think I now have a
>     better understanding of your problem statement than before. Thanks!
> 
>     As far as I am understanding it for now, the question is: "is it
>     possible to determine that the configuration/policy of a device is
>     acceptable in a fashion that does not expose that configuration/policy
>     to a counterparty?" That question would be independent from "RATS
>     Evidence" which was popping up in the thread before.
> 
> 
> To be clear, that was *Richard's* question. My question was prior to that,
> namely "Is it practical to mechanically verify that a configuration is
> acceptable?"
> 
> -Ekr
> 

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.