[saag] Re: [nasr] Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up
Henk Birkholz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi ekr, I apologize for mixing provenances... again! For me, dipping in into this thread occasionally, it is not easy to track data origin vs. data source without a napkin note. Both questions: "is it possible to determine that the configuration/policy of a device is acceptable in a fashion that does not expose that configuration/policy to a counterparty?" and "Is it practical to mechanically verify that a configuration is acceptable?" sound like really good questions to me. Personally, I am under the assumption that both of these questions are not RATS questions and maybe not even SEC area questions. They seem to me more like OPS area questions, right?. Please chime in here on the SAAG list, if you think that was a weird thing to say! (Obviously, opsec is a thing, but I am referring the "mechanics" of the solution providing an answer to the questions). I also think that (from a RATS perspective) the answer to those questions is really interesting (as it could inform the exposure of RATS conceptual messages). Will these questions be worked on? Viele Grüße, Henk On 11.04.25 23:29, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:50 AM Henk Birkholz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11.04.25 19:23, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Hi Ekr, > > sorry for dragging you through this convo, but I think I now have a > better understanding of your problem statement than before. Thanks! > > As far as I am understanding it for now, the question is: "is it > possible to determine that the configuration/policy of a device is > acceptable in a fashion that does not expose that configuration/policy > to a counterparty?" That question would be independent from "RATS > Evidence" which was popping up in the thread before. > > > To be clear, that was *Richard's* question. My question was prior to that, > namely "Is it practical to mechanically verify that a configuration is > acceptable?" > > -Ekr > _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]