[saag] Re: [nasr] Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follo w-Up

Hi Watson,

> 
> Correct. Some claims are easy to verify. Most aren't. Statements that "the
> router supports X" aren't really interesting. Statements that "this
> configuration will never pass your traffic over a bad link" are, but are a lot
> harder to show.
> 
> >

[LI] Agreed. This is a very claim hard show/attest. 
Note however that this is not what NASR is trying to do. 
NASR is more about router has feature X, Y, and Z which is what I want, and that traffic goes through the selected routers that support X, Y and Z.
NASR is not about proving that traffic does not go somewhere else (proof of non-transit is out of scope). 

Ciao

L.
_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]