[saag] Re: [nasr] Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up

Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Apologies for not paying attention for two months.

>> > Because the values themselves are generally low entropy, so if you
>> > publish their hashes, then it's generally easy to determine the preimage.
>> > 
>> > -Ekr
>> 
>> Would some salt help here (like the salted hashes in sd-cwt)?
>> 
> Probably not very much. What salt does is make it more difficult to amortize computation
> across multiple hashed values. However, if the total number of possible values
> is low (e.g., you have some configuration setting with 3 values) then you can
> just exhaustively search at query time.

I have no idea how NASR would use selective disclosure, but in SD-JWT the salt is part of the disclosure, so it would not be available to someone trying to enumerate claim values without being the recipient of a disclosure.

(Of course, this doesn’t solve the problem that a disclosure for the setting value would need to be made available to an appraiser or endorser or some such, but that is ultimately a process question, akin to selecting an auditor.)

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.