[saag] Re: [nasr] Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Apologies for not paying attention for two months. >> > Because the values themselves are generally low entropy, so if you >> > publish their hashes, then it's generally easy to determine the preimage. >> > >> > -Ekr >> >> Would some salt help here (like the salted hashes in sd-cwt)? >> > Probably not very much. What salt does is make it more difficult to amortize computation > across multiple hashed values. However, if the total number of possible values > is low (e.g., you have some configuration setting with 3 values) then you can > just exhaustively search at query time. I have no idea how NASR would use selective disclosure, but in SD-JWT the salt is part of the disclosure, so it would not be available to someone trying to enumerate claim values without being the recipient of a disclosure. (Of course, this doesn’t solve the problem that a disclosure for the setting value would need to be made available to an appraiser or endorser or some such, but that is ultimately a process question, akin to selecting an auditor.) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]