[saag] Re: Relative OIDs are the simpler form of OID (Re : A simpler form of OID)
Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMm+LwgcZ3Z+Te3QpBCCM4vUuJY-io-y=h8PnviYALTDSKNHTw@mail.gmail.com> |
Do we really have to argue over that to agree on my original point that the original motivation for layering every application protocol over HTTP (because it is the only thing allowed through the firewalls) has been rendered obsolete because QUIC with cheap TLS certs achieves the same goal? The reason every Web site has been forced to use TLS is that Chrome makes it very difficult to visit a site that doesn't have a valid cert. The origins of LetsEncrypt are besides the point, it was Google stuck a gun to everyone's head and forced them to use 'em. On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 5:04 PM Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > - The cheap TLS certs are cheap because they work with the DNS and > - automatically issue certificates upon proof of control of a DNS name. > > > That’s kind of backwards. A main reason for free certs was because, as a > fundamental principle, the creators of LetsEncrypt wanted them to be free > and automation was seen as one of the best ways to reduce the cost by > removing the human. > > > - They are cheap because Google underwrote the cost of production > because certain ISPs were stealing advertising dollars from Google by > replacing the ads placed by the content provider with ads sold by the ISP. > > > This is completely and totally wrong, and I see that EKR posted some > details about why. > > > _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]