Re: The future of SACRED
Dale Gustafson <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:10:02 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen, Your suggested schedule should be ok for a final draft of the framework document as well. We should probably plan on next revision of framework issued 1-2 weeks after next revision of protocol doc. Regards, Dale Gustafson Future Foundation Inc. +1 651 452-9033 office +1 218 343-9724 mobile Stephen Farrell wrote: > I know we said "before SLC" in that mail, but 48 hours > later and no reaction at all tells me something:-) > > Assuming no change from this, we'll be working to the > following schedule: > > - Discuss current drafts in SLC > - Re-issue in early/mid Jan (basically asap given the holidays) > - Issue 2 week WG last call > - Send to IESG after resolution of the (likely few:-) last call comments > (possibly early Feb) > - WG goes dormant, then shuts-down when RFC(s) issue(s) > > I'm ok with that schedule for the protocol draft. > Any problems for the framework authors? > Stephen. <snip>