Re: The future of SACRED

Dale Gustafson <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:10:02 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sacred
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Stephen,

Your suggested schedule should be ok for a final draft of the framework document
as well.

We should probably plan on next revision of framework issued 1-2 weeks after
next revision of protocol doc.

Regards,

Dale Gustafson
Future Foundation Inc.
+1 651 452-9033 office
+1 218 343-9724 mobile


Stephen Farrell wrote:

> I know we said "before SLC" in that mail, but 48 hours
> later and no reaction at all tells me something:-)
>
> Assuming no change from this, we'll be working to the
> following schedule:
>
> - Discuss current drafts in SLC
> - Re-issue in early/mid Jan (basically asap given the holidays)
> - Issue 2 week WG last call
> - Send to IESG after resolution of the (likely few:-)  last call comments
> (possibly early Feb)
> - WG goes dormant, then shuts-down when RFC(s) issue(s)
>
> I'm ok with that schedule for the protocol draft.
> Any problems for the framework authors?

> Stephen.

<snip>