Re: SACRED Protocol (long!)
"Marshall T. Rose" <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:45:19 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <005401c17e9f$4d4dd1d0$fe0aa840@FATORA> |
> -allow SACRED protocol exchanges to run on top of any reliable > transport, including SOAP, http, BEEP, and other protocols, > -allow easy integration of other SASL mechanisms than SRP into the > protocol, and > -allow the use of other security context establishment techniques > than those provided by SASL. err, the dependence on beep is a good thing simply because it allows you to avoid having to deal with the 101 administrative issues that arise otherwise. if you want to have something that runs on lots of different things, then can i suggest that you remove the beep support simply because you have very effectively negated 90% of the advantages of using beep... /mtr