Re: sasl in beep or payload

Keith Moore wrote:
> 
> > From: Marshall Rose <[email protected]>
[...]
> > the real issue isn't where the sasl payload goes. the real issue is whether
> > we want to support http and/or whether we want to support multiple ways of
> > exchanging sacred pdus.
> 
> these are separate issues.  the issue of where the sasl payload goes
> mostly has to do with the coupling of the authentication mechanism and
> the application.

I agree with Keith and since no-one else seems to be arguing for
sticking with the sasl-in-beep approach, I'll push those up to
the payload in the next version.

Just to be clear - this doesn't at all address the http/beep issue.

Stephen.

-- 
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:[email protected]
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com