Re: sasl in beep or payload

Keith Moore <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:56:12 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sacred
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I have some sympathy for this myself, but judging by the raised
> hands, the consensus amongst those who'd implement sacred was to
> include the sasl pdus in the payload.

I think several people were assuming that there would need to be 
multiple substrates for sacred, and this was to some degree 
motivating the push toward putting sasl pdus in the payload.

I think that the assumption that there should be multiple substrates
needs to be a separate discussion topic, because IMHO this will both
degrade interoperability and make the sacred protocol more complex.

Keith