Re: BEEP adjustments [was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sacred-protocol-bss-01.txt]

> So - if no-one wants to keep 2.4 (or similar language), I'll delete
> it, but will add something about avoiding DoS (listener having a
> timeout etc) to the security considerations section. (That text
> must nearly be boilerplate by now - anyone know where I can lift
> it from?)

in the security section, just add a sentence indicating that, as with all
protocols, a listener implementation should implement an inactivity timer.

/mtr