Re: SACRED in Minneapolis

Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Mon, 04 Mar 2002 15:40:43 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sacred
Organization	Baltimore Technologies Ltd.
Message-ID	<[email protected]>


The open issues listed in the protocol draft being:-

   - Multiple substrates issue
   - SASL authorization identity issue
   - Should we apply for a port number? (probably)
   - Should the DTD or schema be normative? I'd usually go for the
     schema, but in this case the DTD seems much simpler.
     - Fix DTD extensibility scheme
   - Should we specify a max value where "unbounded" is in the schema
     or "+"/"*" in the DTD?

Magnus Nystrom wrote:
> 
> Dear WG,
> 
> The intention is to have a SACRED meeting in Minneapolis, discussing any
> remaining issues in the protocol draft (-02) and the new framework draft
> (-03). Currently, our time slot is Monday, March 18th, at 1 pm.
> 
> If you have suggestions for other items to discuss please let me know
> before March 11 and I'll send out an agenda.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- Magnus
> Magnus Nystrom
> RSA Security

-- 
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:[email protected]
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com