Re: protocol progress...
Magnus Nystrom <[email protected]> Tue, 14 May 2002 14:35:45 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.WNT.4.43.0205141127400.104-100000@mnystrom-lap> |
All, In an attempt to bring closure to the discussion over the mandated-to-implement client authentication mechanism in SACRED, can I suggest the following: For the initial version of SACRED, clients and servers are REQUIRED to support TLS for server authentication and transport security (mandated TLS cipher suite remains to be settled, but I cannot recall any objections to the proposed one) and to support DIGEST-MD5 (authentication only) for client authentication. This follows the plan outlined by Stephen in his 8 April message. Given that SACRED's protocol is based on BEEP and, in particular, BEEP's support for SASL, -particular implementations may easily choose to support any other SASL mechanism, and -the SACRED WG may later on, without extensive work, decide to add to or otherwise change the set of mandated mechanisms, should implementation experience or other reasons motivate it. -- Magnus