Re: protocol progress (again!)

Marshall Rose <[email protected]> Thu, 30 May 2002 11:31:14 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sacred
Organization Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> C. Change the protocol draft to use something we know won't get
> stuck in the IESG for process reasons. Magnus made a specific 
> suggestion for this previously that we'd have to finalise on 
> the list in the event we get clear concensus on this option
> (which we need to get to proceed with it).

> Can you express your preference over the next few days? (Note:
> In the absence of clear concensus on this emerging over the 
> next week, Mangus and I will simply annouce our preferred option 

options C.

/mtr