Re: protocol progress (again!)
Marshall Rose <[email protected]> Thu, 30 May 2002 11:31:14 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dover Beach Consulting, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> C. Change the protocol draft to use something we know won't get > stuck in the IESG for process reasons. Magnus made a specific > suggestion for this previously that we'd have to finalise on > the list in the event we get clear concensus on this option > (which we need to get to proceed with it). > Can you express your preference over the next few days? (Note: > In the absence of clear concensus on this emerging over the > next week, Mangus and I will simply annouce our preferred option options C. /mtr