RE: protocol progress (again!)

+1
abbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marshall Rose [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: protocol progress (again!)
> 
> 
> 
> > C. Change the protocol draft to use something we know won't get
> > stuck in the IESG for process reasons. Magnus made a specific 
> > suggestion for this previously that we'd have to finalise on 
> > the list in the event we get clear concensus on this option
> > (which we need to get to proceed with it).
> 
> > Can you express your preference over the next few days? (Note:
> > In the absence of clear concensus on this emerging over the 
> > next week, Mangus and I will simply annouce our preferred option 
> 
> options C.
> 
> /mtr
>