RE: protocol progress (again!)
"Gareth Richards" <[email protected]> Fri, 31 May 2002 08:47:00 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <418A63CAEBF2D4118A1A00508BB1A0B801CF91FD@exuk01> |
Option C. > C. Change the protocol draft to use something we know won't get > stuck in the IESG for process reasons. Magnus made a specific > suggestion for this previously that we'd have to finalise on > the list in the event we get clear concensus on this option > (which we need to get to proceed with it). > > > Can you express your preference over the next few days? (Note: > In the absence of clear concensus on this emerging over the > next week, Mangus and I will simply annouce our preferred option > to the list and the ADs.) >