RE: protocol progress (again!)

"Gareth Richards" <[email protected]> Fri, 31 May 2002 08:47:00 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sacred
Message-ID <418A63CAEBF2D4118A1A00508BB1A0B801CF91FD@exuk01>
Option C.

> C. Change the protocol draft to use something we know won't get
> stuck in the IESG for process reasons. Magnus made a specific 
> suggestion for this previously that we'd have to finalise on 
> the list in the event we get clear concensus on this option
> (which we need to get to proceed with it).
> 
> 
> Can you express your preference over the next few days? (Note:
> In the absence of clear concensus on this emerging over the 
> next week, Mangus and I will simply annouce our preferred option 
> to the list and the ADs.)
>