DTD or not?
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:57:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Organization | Baltimore Technologies Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All, I've (finally!) started work on the next rev of the protocol draft. There are, of course, a few things I need to get clarified to make the right changes, so this is probably the first of a few mails. The last meeting minutes say: "DTD or schema being normative: The WG seemed to favor having the schema be normative, and drop the DTD." But then says: "DTD Extensibility scheme: Stephen has agreed to fix this in the next draft; there was no further discussion." Does that mean: (a) drop the DTD and there's nothing to fix (b) include the DTD as non-normative and fix the extensibility scheme I'll assume (a) unless I hear yells to the contrary. Regards, Stephen. -- ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Farrell Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 Dublin 8. mailto:[email protected] Ireland http://www.baltimore.com