Re: DTD or not?
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:00:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sacred |
|---|---|
| Organization | Baltimore Technologies Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marshall Rose wrote: > > > Does that mean: > > > > (a) drop the DTD and there's nothing to fix > > (b) include the DTD as non-normative and fix the extensibility > > scheme > > > > I'll assume (a) unless I hear yells to the contrary. > > perhaps you want > > (c) drop the DTD and make sure that the schema is correct. Yes. However, I think that (c)==(pedantic-a) :-) Stephen. -- ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Farrell Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 Dublin 8. mailto:[email protected] Ireland http://www.baltimore.com