Re: Editorial corrections [Was: Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sacred-protocol-bss-03.txt]]

We're getting there (I think)...

-- Magnus

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Stephen Farrell wrote:

[...]
> "Nystrom, Magnus" wrote:

[...]
> > -Section 2.1.3, last sentence: Remove.
> >
> >  Reason: Not needed. Sentence is already in the previous paragraph.
>
> Nope. The "MUST" is needed (to match end user expectations). I think
> its fine as is.

Sorry, meant Section 2.1.4.

> > -Section 3.1, the example: Replace the "<![CDATA..." text with
> >  something simpler, e.g. "<sacred:DownloadRequest.../>"
> >
> >  Reason: We use an XML schema, not a DTD to define the protocol. This
> >  is the only place where CDATA is used in this memo.
>
> Nope. But I'll happily apply a concrete suggested change so long as
> Marshall doesn't have any BEEP problems, i.e. no change made for now.

Marshall, does BEEP require sending of the "![CDATA..." ?

-- Magnus