RE: Update
Tom Arnold <[email protected]> Tue, 05 Oct 1999 10:27:41 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.scmp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Manros brings up a good point. I blew it and included the incorrect signature file to my last mail message. If I offended anyone, please excuse this indescretion. Hope you all will take a look at the document as it is filed when it comes out. Tom >From: "Manros, Carl-Uno B" <[email protected]> >To: Tom Arnold <[email protected]> >Cc: "Manros, Carl-Uno" <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: Update >Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 10:25:37 -0700 >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) > >Tom, > >The note at the end of your message is a strange one for an open IETF email >list! >I assume it is attached to ALL your outgoing mail, but still... > >Carl-Uno Manros > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tom Arnold [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 6:49 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Update >> >> >> We have taken comments on draft 3 (currently posted) and have produced >> draft 04. The primary changes are in two areas: >> >> - Some wordsmithing related to non-repudiation >> >> - Added an XML payload example. This has actually been a hot >> issue in that >> our original intent was to define a protocol that was >> completely payload >> independent. That being said, we went ahead and produced a section >> describing how a XML DTD and data would be encapsulated and >> transported in >> an SCMP message. We have struck a compromise in that we >> illustrated how an >> XML message would be delivered, not defining any type of >> message taxonomy. >> Groups like Rosetta Net, CompTIA, DISA, EDIInt, IOTP, OBI, >> and others using >> private protocols are responsible for providing actual >> message definition. >> >> Our intent and belief is that this version is ready to become an >> Informational RFC. Once I receive confirmation that the draft has been >> posted, I'll notify the list. >> >> >> >> Thomas A. Arnold CyberSource >> Corporation >> Chief Technical Officer 550 S. >> Winchester Bl. #301 >> San Jose, CA 95128 >> [email protected] Direct: 1.408.260.6010 >> http://www.cybersource.com/ Main: 1.408.556.9100 >> -------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------------- >> This Email and any attached files are confidential and may also be >> privileged. It is intended only for the individual or entity to whom >> it is addressed. If you are not the recipient or an authorized agent >> of the recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, >> dissemination, >> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. >> If you have received this message in error, please contact >> CyberSource >> Corporation immediately at (408) 556-9100. >> >> Thank you. >> > >