Re: [CARD Editorial Issue] Standards Language
Charlie Perkins <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Organization | Nokia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Jim, I am sure this is not right. A protocol specification within the IETF needs to use RFC 2119 language even if it's an individual contribution, not on the standards track, designated as Experimental, whatever. It's a property of protocol metalanguage, not state of standardization. Regards, Charlie P. James Kempf wrote: >This draft is meant to be an experimental RFC. Therefore, it should not use >standards language (MUST/SHALL, etc.). > > jak > > >_______________________________________________ >Seamoby mailing list >[email protected] >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > >