Assigned issue 25 - and accepted.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext James Kempf [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 01 July, 2003 02:36
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Seamoby] CT: [New Editorial Issue] Need a
> Contributors Section
>
>
> The Seamoby Review Board was explicitly solicited for and
> provided detailed
> commentary on the CT draft. As such, the contribution of the
> review board
> members should receive a larger acknowledgement (as should
> that for anybody
> else who took the time to read through the whole draft and
> write up a list
> of detailed comments). Therefore, the names of the Review
> Board members
> should be included in a Contributors section. The following
> describes this
> section (from draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-06.txt):
>
> An RFC may include a Contributors section, listing those
> contributors who deserve significant credit for
> the document
> contents. The Contributors section is intended to
> provide a
> level of recognition greater than an acknowledgment and
> nearly equal to listing on the front page. The choice of
> either, both, or none of Contributor and Acknowledgment
> sections in a particular RFC depends upon the circumstance.
>
> Contributors to the CT review were Basavaraj Patil, Pekka
> Savola, and Atti
> Tuominen. Note that we are also attempting to get the names
> of the Review
> Board on the Seamoby Web page, but the change is currently on
> hold pending
> AD review.
>
> jak
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.