RE: Review of draft-ietf-semoby-card-protocol-02.txt

Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1 <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <[email protected]>

-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Petander [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:36 AM
To: Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Review of draft-ietf-semoby-card-protocol-02.txt


Hello Ajoy,

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1 wrote:
>
> AJOY-> Well, it helps to reduce the number of messages processed
> by CAR in the long run. Processing extra new messages may be
> more expensive than adding some additional processing overhead in
> the existing messages.
>
> This optimization also adds extra complexity to the protocol, and it is
> not clear to me whether it is worth it.
>
> AJOY-> I am not clear how it will complicate the implementation of CARD
protocol.

Not much, but it still changes the simple request-reply nature to optimize
the protocol. I am not sure whether this optimization is generally useful.
The usefulness depends on the amount of MNs, MN mobility patterns and the
lifetimes of the capabilities. I agree that in some situations this could
reduce the load on the ARs, so I am fine with the MAY for this.

AJOY-> Ok, we will make this a MAY. 

Henrik

		----------------------------------
		Henrik Petander
		Helsinki University of Technology,
		GO/Core Project
		[email protected]
		Office: +358 (0)9 451 5846
		GSM: +358 (0)40 741 5248
		----------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.