Re: (virtual) hum on CARD open issues

Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1 wrote:
> 
> otherwise you need seperate code for processing an ICMP
> CARD Request (from the MN) and UDP CARD Request (from
> the PAR).
> 
> AJOY->  I guess you can still keep
> CARD AVP parsing code same. But I do admit some additional code will
> be required to support two different transport protocols.
> But does this justify ICMP as an AR-AR transport
> Protocol? As far as I know ICMP was not designed for transport
> Protocol so why are you changing this? Well, what other's think?
> 
> also, if it is an ICMP message, I can piggyback
> CARD messages on HI/HACK messages of FMIPv6.
> 
> AJOY-> Sometime. But timing of CARD Request/CARD Reply may not coincide with that
> of HI/HACK.

allright. I am fine with what you say.

Vijay