Re: CARD issue#30: L2 type indicators to be assigned by IANA

"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <000101c3540a$cc2615c0$116015ac@dclkempt40>
Experimental protocols also may request IANA assignments. W.r.t. whether an
L2 identifier is needed or not, I would suggest checking to see if there is
one already that can be reused, and, if not, put in a request for one.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marco Liebsch" <[email protected]>
To: "Seamoby" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 4:04 PM
Subject: [Seamoby] CARD issue#30: L2 type indicators to be assigned by IANA


> One of the comments to the L2 ID sub-option was that
> "L2-type" identifiers need to be assigned by IANA.
> Now, I assume that in case we ask IANA for type
> identifiers, we need to give also a list of interface
> types. This lists needs then to be extended later for
> future technologies...
> I am not sure if this is really required for the
> experimental protocol. Take into account that using
> the L2-type identifier has been indicated to be
> optional.
>
> Comments?
>
> marco
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.