Re: CARD issue#30: L2 type indicators to be assigned by IANA
"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000101c3540a$cc2615c0$116015ac@dclkempt40> |
Experimental protocols also may request IANA assignments. W.r.t. whether an
L2 identifier is needed or not, I would suggest checking to see if there is
one already that can be reused, and, if not, put in a request for one.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marco Liebsch" <[email protected]>
To: "Seamoby" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 4:04 PM
Subject: [Seamoby] CARD issue#30: L2 type indicators to be assigned by IANA
> One of the comments to the L2 ID sub-option was that
> "L2-type" identifiers need to be assigned by IANA.
> Now, I assume that in case we ask IANA for type
> identifiers, we need to give also a list of interface
> types. This lists needs then to be extended later for
> future technologies...
> I am not sure if this is really required for the
> experimental protocol. Take into account that using
> the L2-type identifier has been indicated to be
> optional.
>
> Comments?
>
> marco
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>