Re: CARD issue#29: more text on use of "Context-ID" and"M-flag"required

fine with me.

Marco Liebsch wrote:
> 
> I agree. Also specific text on use of the context-id will be incorporated.
> However, since we found that the L2 ID has to carry kind of status code
> to indicate to the MN in a reply that AR was not able to resolve the
> requested L2 ID (issue#39), we can avoid the M-flag and incorporate all
> these
> notifications into an 8 bit status code field within the L2 ID sub-option.
> This means for example. 0x00 set by default in a CARD Request when
> MN sends the L2 ID for resolution to its AR. AR can return 0x01 as an
> OK indicator, 0x02 could be the indicator that L2 ID matches with a
> previously
> resolved CAR IP address (context-id match, replaces the M-flag), 0x03 could
> indicate the error case due to the AR was not able to resolve the L2 ID...
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> marco