Re: SAML, Liberty Aliance, SISO, EAP vs SeaMoby CT

Hello Phil,

Welcome back!

[email protected] wrote:

>I am curious what some folks on this list think about
>SeaMoby CT versus the notion of federated identity
>being promoted by the Liberty Alliance.
>
Since access routers are unlikely to check the federated identity
credentials locally, I reckon that we would need a new security
profile type for such data, and that it would be subject to context
transfer in the same way as envisioned for other security data.

>Is anybody planning on implementing SeaMoby CT?
>  
>
We already have implemented a pretty complete system with it.
My belief is that it should be about ready for actual standardization,
regardless of the "Experimental" designation.

>"NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
>intended by Convergys Corporation for the use of the named individual or
>entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is
>privileged or otherwise confidential.  If you have received this electronic
>mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without
>copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email
>or by telephone (collect), so that the sender's address records can be
>corrected."
>  
>
O.K.  Point noted.

Regards,
Charlie P.