Re: CTP Issue 15: CTAR Relay
"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <019001c37c6a$b768eb70$956015ac@dclkempt40> |
Sorry for this post, the CTAR issue has been closed already. I'm still
getting used to the issues page format.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Kempf" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:50 AM
Subject: [Seamoby] CTP Issue 15: CTAR Relay
> The specification does not adequately define CTAR relay. Possible
> resolutions are:
>
> 1) Add text to define CTAR relay.
>
> 2) Drop CTAR relay.
>
> Suggested resolution: 2
> Justification: Motivation for this function is not clear, simplifying the
> protocol at this point is likely to make it easier for people to
understand
> and thus implement.
>
> Comments?
>
> jak
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>