RE: CTP Issue 12: Use of MN's new care-of address

Hi James,

I have added the following text to the CTD message:

	Note that the new AR must defend the new Care-of-Address using proxy ARP 
	or Neighbor Discovery. 

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext James Kempf [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 16 September, 2003 20:26
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Seamoby] CTP Issue 12: Use of MN's new care-of address
> 
> 
> If MN's new care-of address is included in CTAR or CTD
> before it is assigned on the MN, nAR must defend new CoA
> (at least for IPv6 DAD) until MN claims it.  Should this
> requirement be stated?  Or can the new CoA only be used in
> CTAR or CTD if it is already assigned to the MN?  If so,
> then it should be clearly stated.
> See http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue12 for
> details.Suggested resolution: Include text noting that the new AR must
> defend the address using proxy ARP/ND.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>