RE: CTP Issue 13 - Generic message header

Hi James,

I think that this is reasonable. We can delete the generic header.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext James Kempf [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 16 September, 2003 20:23
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Seamoby] CTP Issue 13 - Generic message header
> 
> 
> The text describing Issue 13 isn't quite clear to me, but I'm 
> interpreting
> as follows:
> 
> Section 2.4 of the spec defines a generic CTP header, but the 
> subsections
> define specific headers that are different for specific 
> messages. Which is
> correct?
> 
> See 
> http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue13 for more
> details.
> 
> Possible resolutions:
> 
> 1) Modify the headers for specific messages to use the generic header.
> 2) Drop the generic header.
> 
> Suggested resolution: Drop the generic header.
> Justification: The fact that the individual messages have 
> their own headers
> suggests they need different information in the header. The 
> simplest course
> therefore seems to drop the generic header.
> 
> Comments?
> 
>             jak
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>