Re: Preferences and Requirements Options (was Re: Proposal to resolve remaining CARD issues)
Vijay Devarapalli <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:20:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eunsoo Shim wrote: > The MN does not lose connectivity necessarily in the case you described. what I meant, if there are no candidate ARs, the MN loses connectivity eventually. > However, if the requirements are something in which there is no flexibility > with the MN such as link type, the empty reply means there is no access > network supporting the link type. In the case, losing connectivity may not > be unavoidable if the MN keeps moving far from the old access point/base > station. let the MN make the decision, if no CARs can satisfy its requirements. and you have the preferences options for the MN to tell the current AR what it wants. Vijay