Re: CARD: handling of sequence numbers

"Eunsoo Shim" <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:03:51 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <012601c3971b$5f8356e0$c96b0f8a@peace>
>
> > In case we keep 1 second also for the MN_AR_TIMEOUT, there should not be
> > a conflict,
> > right? Otherwise, we could also let the MN "flag" a CARD REQUEST in case
> > it is a retransmission.
> > But I guess this introcuced more complexity compared to the benefit.
> > What do you think?
>
> Isn't the MN-AR request resend interval the same as the minimum interval
> for new requests? So a flag may be the easiest way to allow AR to
> distinguish new requests from resends.
>
If both time intervals are the same, does the AR need to distinguish a
resent Request from a new Request for rate limiting?

Eunsoo