Re: Preferences and Requirements Options (was Re: Proposal to resolve remaining CARD issues)
"Eunsoo Shim" <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:56:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <011701c398bd$68568f50$c96b0f8a@peace> |
> > I propose to keep going for the 2 separate sub-options. However, in case > we drop also the > AVP Length fields in a Preferences sub-option for bandwidth > optimization, we have the > same problem as we have for the L2-ID, which is related to "length > without padding" and > "length with padding". For a solution I propose the following: Just list > Attribute values (each > has 16 bit). In case (# of attributes) mod 2 = 0, fine, otherwise attach > Attribute value > 0x00 for padding. Value = 0x00 should then not be used for capabilities. > > What do you think? > I agree to the proposal in the above. Eunsoo