Re: Preferences and Requirements Options (was Re: Proposal to resolve remaining CARD issues)

If there are no concerns to the proposed solution until Friday, we'll 
close this issue then
and adjust the text in the draft for the next update.

Any comments?

marco

Eunsoo Shim wrote:

>>I propose to keep going for the 2 separate sub-options. However, in case 
>>we drop also the
>>AVP Length fields in a Preferences sub-option for bandwidth 
>>optimization, we have the
>>same problem as we have for the L2-ID, which is related to "length 
>>without padding" and
>>"length with padding". For a solution I propose the following: Just list 
>>Attribute values (each
>>has 16 bit). In case (# of attributes) mod 2 = 0, fine, otherwise attach 
>>Attribute value
>>0x00 for padding. Value = 0x00 should then not be used for capabilities.
>>
>>What do you think?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I agree to the proposal in the above.
>
>Eunsoo
>  
>