Re: IESG Review: draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology (Re: ID Tracker State Update Notice)
Thierry Ernst <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:24:12 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Organization | Keio University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
A few more minor comments, if it's not too late:
- I would add "HoA" next to the term "Home Address" as this is done in
Care-of Address (CoA).
- a question concerning the term "link" was left unanswered. I attach
the mail. I also had interest into clarifying.
- a definition about what a subnet is may be useful since the term is
used in many places in the document.
- Mobile Node (MN)
An IP node capable of changing its point of attachment to the
network. A Mobile Node may or may not have forwarding
functionality.
-> I would add "MR" and "MH" in it:
An IP node capable of changing its point of attachment to the
network. A Mobile Node may either be a Mobile Host (no forwarding
functionality) or a Mobile Router (forwarding functionality).
or mention something about forwarding functionality in defs of MH and MR.
- Mobile Host (MH)
".... A Mobile host..." -> capitalize Host.
- Mobile Router (MR)
In the middle paragraph, I would recommend to move the sentence about
"ingress interface" and the one about "egress interfaces" as standalones
definitions. Those 2 terms are extensively used in NEMO WG. The last
paragraph shall be kept under the definition of MR.
- Network mobility
-> I would add something similar to first sentence of "host mobility"
refers to the function of allowing an entire network to change its
point of attachment to the network, and thus its reachability in the
topology, without interrupting IP packet delivery to/from that mobile network.
And, as long as we are using the term "function" into the definition of
either "host mobility" or "network mobility", it would make sense to add
the word "support" to both terms:
-> replace "Host Mobility" with "Host Mobility Support" and "Network
Mobility" with "Network Mobility Support".
E.g: I don't have any support function on my laptop, so by doing host
mobility I cannot maintain sessions. It's the fact that I do have "host
mobility support" abilities that my sessions do not break.
Thierry.
link-definition.txt
(text/plain, 3.5 KB)
Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp ([unix socket]) by shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Cyrus v2.0.17); Thu, 04 Sep 2003 20:30:50 +0900 X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf-ops.ietf.org [132.151.6.20]) by shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5D75D09D; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:30:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19usJO-0002bd-3C; Thu, 04 Sep 2003 07:30:02 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19usIU-0002ai-RH for [email protected]; Thu, 04 Sep 2003 07:29:06 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA13020 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:29:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19usIU-0002p6-00 for [email protected]; Thu, 04 Sep 2003 07:29:06 -0400 Received: from clarinet.u-strasbg.fr ([130.79.90.157]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19usIT-0002p2-00 for [email protected]; Thu, 04 Sep 2003 07:29:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 30950 invoked for bounce); 4 Sep 2003 11:39:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clarinet.u-strasbg.fr) (montavont@unknown) by unknown with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 4 Sep 2003 11:39:10 -0000 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:28:44 +0900 From: Nicolas Montavont <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030727 Thunderbird/0.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [email protected] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Seamoby] Question on link definition Sender: [email protected] Errors-To: [email protected] X-BeenThere: [email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe> Hi, I have a question about the definition of "link" in draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology-04.txt It is said: "A communication facility or physical medium that can sustain data communications between multiple network nodes, such as an Ethernet (simple or bridged). A link is the layer immediately below IP." As I undestand, the definition of link is not directly related to an IPv6 link. For example, consider the following example: One ethernet link where a router advertises a single IPv6 prefix, and an 802.11b access point connected to this ethernet link as illustrated here: AR ____ |__________________ | | AP Fixed node MN2 MN1 In this situation, is it right to say that : - there are 2 links and - there is one IPv6 link ? Thanks Regards, Nicolas _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby