Re: CTP - a few comments on draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-05...

Hi,

>Lucian,
>
>Before assigning an issue, I have some questions.
>
>  
>
>>    Can we steal two bits from 'Researved' "area" and use them for a 'V' 
>>    flag within the Context Transfer Activate Acknowledge (CTAA) Message?
>>    The same thing for Context Transfer Cancel (CTC) Message...
>>    
>>
>
>Can you give me any more reason & text you think is appropriate?
>
If an AR acknowledges a CTAR Message in which we set the 'V' flag to 
'10' (both IPv6 and IPv4),
how can the MN decide if there is a IPv4 address or a IPv6 address 
within the CTAA Message? 

>>    Is the 'A' flag within CTD Message linked in some way to 'A' flag within 
>>    
>>
>      CTAR Message? E.g., if the MN has set the 'A' to '1' in CTAR, then the pAR should 
>  
>
>>    (or must) also set the 'A' to '1' within the CTD Message?
>>    However, the definition for 'A' flag is the same in both messages... 
>>    (i.e., "the MN requests an acknowledgement"??).
>>    
>>
>
>No linkage is meant.
>
OK.

>>    Furthermore, does an 'A' flag within the CT Request Message sound 
>>    totally inappropriate for the time being
>>    (i.e., it might be in relation to the 'A' flag received by the nAR 
>>    within CTAR Message)?
>>    
>>
>
>Sorry, I don't get your meaning here.
>  
>
If no linkage is meant, there is no meaning here :)
So, we should forget this comment...

Lucian