Re: [issue30] How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?

Julien Bournelle wrote:

> > >
> >
> > pAR MUST respond to nAR with an appropriate error.
> > nAR SHOULD convey the result to the MN.
>
> I agree with that but how to carry this error ? In the CTD message or do
> we create a new message to carry error ?
>

This should be supplied in CTD. We don't need another
message particularly for carrying the error.

Regards,

-Rajeev


>
> thanks,
>
> >
> > -Rajeev
> >
> >
> > >
> > > others ?
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > category: Editorial
> > > document: draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-05.txt
> > > messages: 39
> > > nosy: jloughney
> > > priority: Should Fix
> > > status: No Discussion
> > > title: How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?
> > > _____________________________________________________________
> > > Seamoby CTP Issues <[email protected]>
> > > <http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue30>
> > > _____________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Seamoby mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seamoby mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
> >
>
> --
> [email protected]