Re: [issue30] How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?

Julien Bournelle <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:59:53 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi 

On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:01:58PM -0800, Rajeev Koodli wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> is your concern message tampering between pAR and nAR ?
> If so, that should apply to all contexts. I think we address that
> by saying the routers SHOULD have SAs.


I just wanted to note that the routers MUST have SAs. (ESP protection)

regards,

-- 
[email protected]