Re: state of the IP micromobility protocols

"James Kempf" <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:27:10 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.seamoby
Message-ID <078c01c3dabb$43055bb0$606015ac@dclkempt40>
There was some work in the IRTF Micromobility Research group, but they have
been dormant for about a year. There is a new IRTF MOBility OPTmizationS
(MOBOPTS) Research Group that might be a possible venue.

In general, the work in the IP micromobility area seems to be primarily at
the research level, and there are not, to my knowledge (which may be
incomplete) any plans for near term deployment (either commercial or
experimental) or product in this area. Hence, it seems like a better problem
for IRTF.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Artur Hecker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:23 AM
Subject: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility protocols


> hello seamoby!
>
>
> i'm sorry for my intervention. i'm currently studying the IP
> micromobility protocols proposed so far (Cellular IP, Hawaii, MIP-RR,
> EMA, IDMP, etc.) but i'm suprised to see that there hardly has been any
> activity in this sector since 2001: all the drafts seem to be expired,
> no RFCs have been published to my knowledge and there are hardly any
> publications on this topic anymore.
>
> so, what is the current state of the IP micromobility protocols? are all
> the problems considered to be more or less solved or has there been a
> consensus on a general change of the approach?
>
> please provide me with some information on this topic.
>
> thank a lot for your time!
>
>
> artur hecker
> ENST Paris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>