Re: Context Block Length Typo in Section 2.4

Raghu further points out (below) that the Message Length in Section 2.5 also
needs to be modified with this change. So I would propose exactly the same
change in Sections 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, 2.5.4, 2.5.5, and 2.5.6.

            jak


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Raghu" <[email protected]>
To: "James Kempf" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Context Block Length Typo in Section 2.4


> Hi James,
>
> Section 2.4 is just the CDB. This CDB is just an
> embedded block of  CT Messages described in section 2.5.
> So I think Message Length in section 2.5 should be increased
> more than section 2.4.
>
> regards,
> Raghu
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Kempf" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 1:22 PM
> Subject: [Seamoby] Context Block Length Typo in Section 2.4
>
>
> > In response to Raghu's note about the limitation imposed by a one byte
> > length on context block lengths, I'd like to propose that we change the
> > units of length from octets to 8 octet words. This would be consistent
> with
> > the 64 bit alignment proposed for the entire data block.
> >
> > The exact wording change in Section 2.4 is:
> >
> >             old:        Length               message length in octets
> >             new:      Length                message length in units of 8
> > octet words
> >
> > If that's OK with everyone, John, can you put it into the current draft
> > without changing the version number and ask that the Draft Editor update
> the
> > version in place? I think for a simple typo they can do it.
> >
> > Thanx.
> >
> >             jak
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seamoby mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
> >
>
>