RE: DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP
"Soliman Hesham" <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:01:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F4410B91C6CC314F9582B1A8E91DC9281BE722@ftmail2000> |
> MN is moving from pAR(v6 & v4) to nAR(v6 & v4). > According to Rajeev's previous mail, only one IP should be used, > either v6 or v4, for AR. In this case I was asking how the > funtionality should be with the above question. => ok. > > I am expecting nothing to break in CTP when MN > moves from v6 to v4 only AR. > Can you please provide some examples that break. => How do you expect the 2 ARs to talk to each other if they don't have a common IP version? If they do then sure CTP will work but nothing else will, like: - connectivity (existing connections) of the MN using its v6 address? - Mobile IPv6 signalling ? This is one of the motivations for the dual stack MIP work that we discussed on MIP6 and v6ops list some time ago. Hesham > > > regards, > Raghu > > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby >