Re: DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP
"James Kempf" <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:39:53 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <049f01c3f7d8$8ca66ea0$936015ac@dclkempt40> |
Yes, that sounds like the confusion.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rajeev Koodli" <[email protected]>
To: "Raghu" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP
> >
> > I understand your point, but
> > I request you to explain how the implementation should be
> > in the following scenario ?
> >
> > When MN moves, MN sends CTAR to nAR,
> > nAR needs to extract IP information from CTAR and send a CTREQ to oAR.
> > When both(IPv4 & IPv6) are present in CTAR, What is the behaviour of nAR
?
> >
>
> In CTREQ, set `V' to 10, include both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in
> "Mobile Node's Previous IP Address" field, construct
> IP Dest = PAR's IP (v4 _or_ v6) address provided in CTAR
> IP Src = NAR's IP (v4 or v6) address.
>
> Is the confusion in whether `V' bits also refer to
> PAR and NAR addresses ? If so, we should clarify that they
> refer to MN's IP addresses only, and that the router address
> must be either IPv4 or IPv6 but not both.
>
> -Rajeev
>
>
> >
> > regards,
> > Raghu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>