RE: CTP and CARD Drafts

Hi James,

> I believe the intent is to get input from a potential customer of CTP, and
> header compression context has always been a top potential customer.

That is what I thought, but I just wanted to make sure.
 
> > > The CARD draft has undergone IESG review. The following 
> list contains
> the
> > > issues and a suggested resolution.
> >
> > Was the list just for CARD?
> >
> 
> The only point that specifically applied to CTP as well was the ICMP type
> code point. The solution I worked out with Thomas and Allison was one type
> code for both protocols, and a separate draft requesting IANA allocation.

OK.
 
> I suspect we might see similar comments from the Security ADs about CTP,
> since the level of detail in the security design for CTP is approximately
> the same as for CARD. I suggest we wait until they've had a chance to review
> it first, however, unless I my dialog with them about CARD suggests that
> they would be happy with a similar solution.

Sounds good.  Thanks for the details.

John